<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People First!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infovark.com/2007/12/10/people-first/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infovark.com/2007/12/10/people-first/</link>
	<description>Digging the world of Enterprise 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: An Enterprise 2.0 Definition &#171; infovark</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2007/12/10/people-first/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>An Enterprise 2.0 Definition &#171; infovark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/2007/12/10/people-first/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] Even establishment figures such as Bill Gates and Robert Scoble have begun criticizing it. Then half the tech blogosphere joined in. The alternative appears to be &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243;, but what does that really mean? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even establishment figures such as Bill Gates and Robert Scoble have begun criticizing it. Then half the tech blogosphere joined in. The alternative appears to be &#8220;Enterprise 2.0&#8243;, but what does that really mean? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infovark &#187; You Sank my Battleship!</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2007/12/10/people-first/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>infovark &#187; You Sank my Battleship!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/2007/12/10/people-first/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] can&#8217;t resist adding my own thoughts about making Enterprise Software sexy. (Gordon posted his comments yesterday.) But in the grand old tradition of Web Pages that Suck, I&#8217;ll do it by talking about the many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can&#8217;t resist adding my own thoughts about making Enterprise Software sexy. (Gordon posted his comments yesterday.) But in the grand old tradition of Web Pages that Suck, I&#8217;ll do it by talking about the many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
