<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jabberwocky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/</link>
	<description>Digging the world of Enterprise 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>OMG! I had the right instinct with "disappointed" but woa! I totally skipped over "I think there are three faulty premises at work here"

wooof ...
... I'll just stop now and read more of your blog.

cheers
*wooot!*
ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! I had the right instinct with &#8220;disappointed&#8221; but woa! I totally skipped over &#8220;I think there are three faulty premises at work here&#8221;</p>
<p>wooof &#8230;<br />
&#8230; I&#8217;ll just stop now and read more of your blog.</p>
<p>cheers<br />
*wooot!*<br />
ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>The one time I exchanged a series of email with TimBL (spring '96) we talked about "task-oriented" VS "brochure". Eleven years ago, and I'm still not seeing task-oriented people pressing Web2.0 types for working solutions.

Anybody who's found gems and other treasures just wandering the stacks of a good library know how rewarding a random walk through a good set of links can be. But I can't help thinking that has skewed intererest. /Digg/ really doesn't relate to business processes, or intelligence analysis, or decision support ... but it sure is popular!

You really seem to have a grasp of this stuff. So I'm doubly disappointed to see you hoe into point #3 with such gusto.
To be frank: that's symptomatic of BluePill.

have fun ... I guess
--bentrem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one time I exchanged a series of email with TimBL (spring &#8216;96) we talked about &#8220;task-oriented&#8221; VS &#8220;brochure&#8221;. Eleven years ago, and I&#8217;m still not seeing task-oriented people pressing Web2.0 types for working solutions.</p>
<p>Anybody who&#8217;s found gems and other treasures just wandering the stacks of a good library know how rewarding a random walk through a good set of links can be. But I can&#8217;t help thinking that has skewed intererest. /Digg/ really doesn&#8217;t relate to business processes, or intelligence analysis, or decision support &#8230; but it sure is popular!</p>
<p>You really seem to have a grasp of this stuff. So I&#8217;m doubly disappointed to see you hoe into point #3 with such gusto.<br />
To be frank: that&#8217;s symptomatic of BluePill.</p>
<p>have fun &#8230; I guess<br />
&#8211;bentrem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sometimes the search is half the fun. &#171; The moving finger</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Sometimes the search is half the fun. &#171; The moving finger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] is half the&#160;fun.  Posted on January 24, 2008 by beatonl   Over at the Infovark site Dean has an interesting post on the semantic web including and analysis on why he thinks there are some faulty concepts particularly around the idea [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is half the&nbsp;fun.  Posted on January 24, 2008 by beatonl   Over at the Infovark site Dean has an interesting post on the semantic web including and analysis on why he thinks there are some faulty concepts particularly around the idea [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/2008/01/21/jabberwocky/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>It also overlooks the fact that many, many people find the act of searching for information enlightening and worthwhile in any case.

I mean, I'm pretty good at using "Dominant Internet Search Engine"TM I can construct a query that will return one or maybe two results that perfectly give me the information I was looking for. 

But I hardly ever do that - because it's all the other odd things I discovers while doing the search, the things I learn, the answers to questions I didn't know I had, that making searching the internet fun...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It also overlooks the fact that many, many people find the act of searching for information enlightening and worthwhile in any case.</p>
<p>I mean, I&#8217;m pretty good at using &#8220;Dominant Internet Search Engine&#8221;TM I can construct a query that will return one or maybe two results that perfectly give me the information I was looking for. </p>
<p>But I hardly ever do that - because it&#8217;s all the other odd things I discovers while doing the search, the things I learn, the answers to questions I didn&#8217;t know I had, that making searching the internet fun&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
