<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter as Social Computer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/10/twitter-as-social-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/10/twitter-as-social-computer/</link>
	<description>Digging the world of Enterprise 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/10/twitter-as-social-computer/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/?p=164#comment-158</guid>
		<description>That's a really good point. 

One of the things I love about Twitter is that it's so light and fluffy - I almost never 'compose' a tweet - just blurt out random stuff. 

If my professional performance was judged by the quality of my tweets, then maybe Twitter would become less useful. The Candidness is part of the goodness. 

The other thing that Twitter does is ditch the politics of "Which person gets on the TO/CC/BCC Lines". 
I think that's a good thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a really good point. </p>
<p>One of the things I love about Twitter is that it&#8217;s so light and fluffy - I almost never &#8216;compose&#8217; a tweet - just blurt out random stuff. </p>
<p>If my professional performance was judged by the quality of my tweets, then maybe Twitter would become less useful. The Candidness is part of the goodness. </p>
<p>The other thing that Twitter does is ditch the politics of &#8220;Which person gets on the TO/CC/BCC Lines&#8221;.<br />
I think that&#8217;s a good thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dugard</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/10/twitter-as-social-computer/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dugard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/?p=164#comment-156</guid>
		<description>One thing I think you miss about Twitter is that in a social world, people are more comfortable asking questions. One large barrier I can see to something like Twitter in a corporate world is that people don't want to seem stupid to their boss and their co-workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I think you miss about Twitter is that in a social world, people are more comfortable asking questions. One large barrier I can see to something like Twitter in a corporate world is that people don&#8217;t want to seem stupid to their boss and their co-workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
