Comments on: State of Emergence-y http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/22/state-of-emergence-y/ Digging the world of Enterprise 2.0 Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:53:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Daria http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/22/state-of-emergence-y/#comment-201 Daria Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:04:45 +0000 http://www.infovark.com/?p=167#comment-201 Gordon, I would agree that the true E2.0 market is much smaller. Emergent structures offer a different way of leading your company, a different way of "controlling" your people, a different way of thinking. It is also true that there needs to be a major cultural change to E2.0 systems to be accepted by most of corporate executives. BTW, you and Dennis might want to have a look at Andrew Filev's Project Management 2.0 blog. This post for example http://www.wrike.com/projectmanagement/02/27/2008/Letting-Users-Take-the-Lead-in-Choosing-their-Tools-Can-Benefit-the-Whole-Business Gordon, I would agree that the true E2.0 market is much smaller. Emergent structures offer a different way of leading your company, a different way of “controlling” your people, a different way of thinking. It is also true that there needs to be a major cultural change to E2.0 systems to be accepted by most of corporate executives.

BTW, you and Dennis might want to have a look at Andrew Filev’s Project Management 2.0 blog. This post for example http://www.wrike.com/projectmanagement/02/27/2008/Letting-Users-Take-the-Lead-in-Choosing-their-Tools-Can-Benefit-the-Whole-Business

]]> By: James Dellow http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/22/state-of-emergence-y/#comment-178 James Dellow Thu, 01 May 2008 02:51:43 +0000 http://www.infovark.com/?p=167#comment-178 You might like slide 15 in this deck here http://www.slideshare.net/chieftech/rebooting-the-enterprise-with-blogs-wikis-and-other-social-software/ titled "Differences between traditional and social software" - however, I see a bit of a grey area between the explicit and emergent systems. In other words, its how we choose to use systems not what they are that defines if they really support emergence(form vs function). You might like slide 15 in this deck here http://www.slideshare.net/chieftech/rebooting-the-enterprise-with-blogs-wikis-and-other-social-software/ titled “Differences between traditional and social software” - however, I see a bit of a grey area between the explicit and emergent systems. In other words, its how we choose to use systems not what they are that defines if they really support emergence(form vs function).

]]> By: Ends and Means « Infovark http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/22/state-of-emergence-y/#comment-177 Ends and Means « Infovark Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:14:53 +0000 http://www.infovark.com/?p=167#comment-177 [...] graphic contrasting explicit software versus emergent software attracted quite a bit of interest. Since we got your attention, I thought I’d talk about the [...] [...] graphic contrasting explicit software versus emergent software attracted quite a bit of interest. Since we got your attention, I thought I’d talk about the [...]

]]> By: Emergent systems and WCM — Too much information http://www.infovark.com/2008/04/22/state-of-emergence-y/#comment-168 Emergent systems and WCM — Too much information Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:43:35 +0000 http://www.infovark.com/?p=167#comment-168 [...] example, Infovark has an interesting post about emergent systems and as I was looking specifically at their table, it struck me how much [...] [...] example, Infovark has an interesting post about emergent systems and as I was looking specifically at their table, it struck me how much [...]

]]>