<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Community the Hard Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infovark.com/2008/05/06/building-community-the-hard-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/05/06/building-community-the-hard-way/</link>
	<description>Digging the world of Enterprise 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Keldsen</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/05/06/building-community-the-hard-way/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Keldsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 02:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/?p=177#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Yikes indeed! (Hey there Sam...)

Great find, and well done dissection of the usability and social issues. Although (and I can hardly believe I&#039;my typing this) I can see their point in allowing you to create an alias for the community section of the site - MS diehards could easily jump all over you (similar to the slashdot experience), and that could be seen as an effort to make it possible to participate &quot;safely.&quot;

Some legalese to say that even with an alias, you still own your own actions - yes, probably over the top. Not hard to see how they want down a route that should&#039;ve made sense, and then blew right past the boundaries of common sense into legal paranoia.

Truly brilliant move to say &quot;don&#039;t participate here&quot; and not link to the appropriate place. If only that text was editable... oh wait, that&#039;s what led to this in the first place! ;)

Cheers,
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes indeed! (Hey there Sam&#8230;)</p>
<p>Great find, and well done dissection of the usability and social issues. Although (and I can hardly believe I&#8217;my typing this) I can see their point in allowing you to create an alias for the community section of the site &#8211; MS diehards could easily jump all over you (similar to the slashdot experience), and that could be seen as an effort to make it possible to participate &#8220;safely.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some legalese to say that even with an alias, you still own your own actions &#8211; yes, probably over the top. Not hard to see how they want down a route that should&#8217;ve made sense, and then blew right past the boundaries of common sense into legal paranoia.</p>
<p>Truly brilliant move to say &#8220;don&#8217;t participate here&#8221; and not link to the appropriate place. If only that text was editable&#8230; oh wait, that&#8217;s what led to this in the first place! <img src='http://www.infovark.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.infovark.com/2008/05/06/building-community-the-hard-way/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infovark.com/?p=177#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Yikes. Many companies fall prey to the stand-and-deliver approach to building community. It&#039;s hard for them to understand that when it comes to dialog, they&#039;re not the experts. I&#039;d presume it&#039;s particularly hard for a company like M$ who has had lawyers needing to help protect them for quite some time. Controlling policy and lawyer speak doesn&#039;t set a great tone for participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes. Many companies fall prey to the stand-and-deliver approach to building community. It&#8217;s hard for them to understand that when it comes to dialog, they&#8217;re not the experts. I&#8217;d presume it&#8217;s particularly hard for a company like M$ who has had lawyers needing to help protect them for quite some time. Controlling policy and lawyer speak doesn&#8217;t set a great tone for participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.infovark.com/2008/05/06/building-community-the-hard-way/feed/ ) in 0.71833 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 2:41 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 3:41 am UTC -->
